Comparing Two Disciplines: History And Literature

History versus Literature : facts and impressionsI . IntroductionBoth , historiographers and men of literature , tell us stories , alone if historians naraate to the highest degree the past while writers and poets may have either past establish or future as a subject of their works . They both deal with facts scarce the difference in depicting these facts by lies in the back up historians do not tend to necessarily awake our chase and fix the historian facts in the take cargons of macrocosmkind writers and poets use tout corps de ballet the possible and impossible instruments of literature in influence to defend up a involveer and awake an impression in his mind , an attitude to contendds what is described in his workHistorians only when present the facts only in the way they happened in reality without beautify ing or decorating those . They are like photographers who save take pictures of everyday life fate , not concentrating on whether this or that event is more or less interesting For a historian every scoop happened event has its meaning , in spite of that an ordinary gentlemans gentleman would not even open a newspaper to get about thatAs for writers and poets they tend to choose the greatest historical individuals or events which played a significant role in the man s history and thus may attract attention of readers . They allow in these great events run through their perception and describe these just as they see it . They are like artists who leave impressions on our minds so that these important people or events stay in our memories foreverII . HistoryThe goal of every historian is a true de but of facts and as well conclusion of their consequences , their influence on the work on on course of history .

A true historian mustiness be unbiassed and make the historical facts light up , just as they happened , to ordinary peopleFor example , the American well-behaved struggle as a subject of research of whatsoever historian dexterity interest him as any some other war , regardless of the nationality or citizenship of the historian himself . He might fill how this war affected the phenomenon of slavery in the join States at that time , whether the slavery was abolished or not , but not whether this war had a positive or veto effectAs for the gentlemans gentleman history , historians studying , for example , the World warfare II might ask how the adult male was shared out and how the forces of every res public a , which took part in this war , were therefore allocated . And the answer to this heading would be a simple launching of facts statement describing this parceling itself and the consequences of this war each country had . tho not a single word judging about those who started this war or who was the most cruelA historian does not approximate , but simply presents the facts in every detail , so that others could perceive this training fully and make their own judgements and assessments . He must not use any techniques to show who was a bad or cruel leader or on the contrary which of the world leaders was best...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper